The Minister of Justice and Attorney General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami has revealed why the Federal Government has failed to release the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu.
This is despite the Federal High Court sitting in Umuahia, the Abia State capital, directing the Federal Government to return Kanu to Kenya and pay him N500 million.
Malami on Thursday disclosed that Kanu is still been held in the facility of the Department of State Services (DSS) due to some factors.
The minister in an interview with Vanguard said the rendition of the IPOB leader could not be used as the only basis to release him.
Read Also BREAKING: Terrorists Alert: IGP Rolls Out Emergency Numbers Nationwide
He further stated that it can not be used to free Kanu of other offences levelled against him by the Federal Government.
Malami noted that the Federal Government is holding onto Kanu on account of four major issues, which were preceded by the rendition matter for which the court cleared him.
Malami said, “To release or not to release Nnamdi Kanu is a function of law and the rule of law for that matter. In arriving at a decision on whether to release or not release, is one; you look at the rule of law, two; you look at the public and the national interest, three; you look at the security situation, four; you look at international diplomacy.
Read Also 2023: Do Not Release Nnamdi Kanu – Miyetti Allah Warns FG
“Let me talk first about the rule of law. This is someone that has been granted bail on account of charges that have been preferred against him at the court. Someone jumping bail to the international community, a case of a fugitive is established against the background of jumping the bail.
“Two, arising from the national security, this is someone that is charged with treason, incitement and destruction of civil authority, murder and assassination of others on account of his incitement, that boil down to issues of national security and criminality.
Read Also BREAKING: Appeal Court Discharges Nnamdi Kanu, Challenges High Court’s Jurisdiction
“Three, on account of international diplomacy, this is someone that has against his person, used the international community or a foreign country to launch an attack against a nation, against his nation for that matter.
“So all these naturally come into play to determine what to do. So if you have through judicial processes establish multiple cases of treason, homicide, and bail-jumping among others; the fact that you have indeed succeeded in one case as against multiple others that are pending goes to establish the fact that that case cannot be the only basis and criteria for determining whether you are entitled to be released or not.”